Investing Opportunity Due Diligence Checklist
For an investment opportunity check http://www.seriousbusinessopportunity.co.uk, which is probably the best investment opportunity of 2011, or contact Marcus : Soyke-Matthews at www.InvestfortheBest.co.uk for investments related to Gold, Silver and commodity markets – mention my name (Kamil) for a special treatment

© Marcus : Soyke-Matthews www.InvestfortheBest.co.uk
Purpose and How to use: This checklist is designed for the questions to be researched/asked and answered as far as possible to assist in assessing an investment opportunity and balancing possible over-enthusiasm based on marketing material or tempting high returns. It does NOT require every question to be answered in the positive, as they may be valid reasons for a less than simple answer. However a non-response in itself should be considered as possibly raising a question. Rather it is to provide the fullest possible information available on order to make an informed risk assessment. Very high returns are possible in the market, which should be balanced with spreading risk across investments or profit opportunities. If sending to the opportunity then DELETE this initial paragraph and centre column first.
Organisation Name:
Completed By (CAPS): Signed: Position: Date:
Questions:
|
Some contact method of real existence. Many offers miss this information. Scams often cannot give out a number that you can call as it gives away their location elsewhere. Verify a real physical base. One company had nice office pictures on their website but was not listed in the German yellow pages as residing there and reception did not know of them. Phone number was a UK only one with no German alternative. |
|
It should be clear exactly which entity you are contracting with and where funds are held. A recent UK fraud used an almost identical company name with no connection. Client Funds should be evidenced as ring fenced. |
|
New organisations are higher risk or a possible re-birth of a different business closed down by regulators. Eg TIRN was reborn as PMO |
|
Non compliance with ‘authorities’ may not be essential for those with privacy knowledge but is often a ‘red flag’. |
|
Late filing may indicate poor management and lack of professionalism or issues with the underlying funds. Audit reports and accounts will show the size of the operation and other useful information. |
|
Longer is better generally (though many funds have a 3 year track record then crash, so the last 6-12 months may more important) |
|
Recent frauds have had small firms with personal connections for many years who have thus not been properly independent or qualified. |
|
There should be a published strategy on risk and money management to avoid blow-ups like LTCM and Amaranth for example |
|
CV history can be checked for accuracy, references taken up. |
|
Several boiler room companies use similar names or even copy registered numbers eg Morgan Soloman sound like Morgan Guarantee and Salomon brothers but is a boiler room set-up. Templeton Capital Wealth Management sounds like Franklin Templeton Investment Management and was apparently falsely claiming their FSA registration number. It may be that under privacy advanced information, the authority has no jurisdiction. Regulation is a cost to a fund and private opportunities may decide not to be regulated by the ‘system’ and this is feasible under private arrangements |
|
Any investment method should be explainable and verifiable to the intelligent layman. Eg in one opportunity of “MTN Notes” –the company could not explain how they made 30% profit per day nor would they show example past trades. Audit trails can of course be falsified if there is collusion. |
|
Brokers can and do go bust (4 in the last 3 years). Funds should be spread across brokers. The country location is relevant for tax, currency and demonetisation risk. |
|
Check the validity of the contracts. If the legalise does not make sense –ask. |
|
Investors should be aware of the amount of any commission paid for transparency and impact on returns. |
|
As above |
|
Ideally there is a sound internal control process, and verifiable statements eg annual audit report |
|
Single or related party dual signatories is a risk for fraudulent diversion of funds. Controls should prevent diversion of funds at any stage. |
|
Investors having successfully withdrawn funds does not prove positive returns. (qv Madoff fraud). Audited accounts and track record with bank and broker bank reconciliation should be available on request. |
|
Acceptance of your funds without any check as to your risk profile or suitability is a red flag. While the investor’s responsibility, genuine fund managers will have an interest in the investors not taking excessive risk in their opportunity. |
To download the above as the Word document (doc file), click here:
DueDiligenceRequestChecklist_I4TB
For an investment opportunity check http://www.seriousbusinessopportunity.co.uk, which is probably the best investment opportunity of 2011, or contact Marcus : Soyke-Matthews at www.InvestfortheBest.co.uk for investments related to Gold, Silver and commodity markets – mention my name (Kamil) for a special treatment
To our success
Kamil


